Issue #1921 has been updated by tuxillo. Description updated Category set to VM subsystem Status changed from New to In Progress Assignee changed from 0 to tuxillo Priority changed from Low to Normal
We do have @mlockall(2)@ but only _MCL_FUTURE_ is currently supported. _MCL_CURRENT_ still needs work to be done. ---------------------------------------- Bug #1921: we miss mlockall http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/1921#change-14288 * Author: alexh * Status: In Progress * Priority: Normal * Assignee: tuxillo * Category: VM subsystem * Target version: 6.4 ---------------------------------------- We don't have the mlockall/munlockall syscalls as documented in [1]. We have at least one tool in base that would benefit from it: cryptsetup. Hopefully someone more familiar with the VM system can implement it without much effort as we already have mlock/munlock. Cheers, Alex Hornung [1]: http://opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/mlockall.html -- You have received this notification because you have either subscribed to it, or are involved in it. To change your notification preferences, please click here: http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/my/account
