DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9038>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9038 suexec is NOT being called by Apache 2.0.36 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-05-17 15:41 ------- Hello. The problem has been somewhat resolved. TERAMOTO Masahiro from the FreeBSD bugs list pointed out that the suexec wrapper is installed as /usr/local/sbin/suexec, meanwhile, mod_suexec.c assumes this wrapper is installed as /usr/local/bin/suexec. Now, I already knew that as a result of some debugging prior to sending the original report, and this is why I used the undocumented configuration option --with-suexec-bin. But unfortunately, I had set it to /usr/local/sbin, as opposed to the full path /usr/local/sbin/suexec. I have now installed apache again, using --with-suexec-bin=/usr/local/sbin/suexec and suexec is called upon the request of a cgi script in a userdir. However now suexec complains "command not in docroot (/usr/tmp/home/devil/public_html/cgi-bin/test.cgi)". I will try to figure this out on my own, and if I can't then I'll get back to you.. so please don't close this bug just yet. Also, as a side note, it would be worthwhile to document --with-suexec-bin at http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/suexec.html and stress that it requires the full path to the binary, not just to the directory where it sits. Finaly, a note about the fact that FreeBSD's port of apache installs suexec in an unexpected location may be worth documenting as well. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
