DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14676>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14676 Using perchild with name based virtual host is unstable [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-25 11:48 ------- Nothing is change. With the same configuration (and AcceptMutex fcntl) the first host in ChildPerUserID definition work right, the second host receive nothing (wait infinitely). In log: [debug] perchild.c(1790): Determining if request should be passed. Child Num: 0, SD: 10, sd from table: 10, hostname from server: soloma.hosts [debug] perchild.c(1790): Determining if request should be passed. Child Num: 0, SD: 8, sd from table: 10, hostname from server: boris.hosts [debug] perchild.c(1799): Passing request. [debug] perchild.c(1655): passing request to another child. Vhost: boris.hosts, child 0 9 [debug] perchild.c(1707): Writing message to 9, passing sd: 28 [debug] perchild.c(1717): Writing message succeeded 39 netstat -a: tcp 1 0 192.168.0.100:www 192.168.0.2:2918 CLOSE_WAIT I think that the reason is the using of sendmsg API. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
