DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8325>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8325 McAfee firewall: operation attempted on something not a socket. winnt_accept: AcceptEx failed [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-25 21:02 ------- As I explained to you in your bug report, XP/WinRoute is yet another example of a badly written WinSock2 plugable driver. Nothing we can do about that, we can't help that driver authors don't thoroughly test their drivers. To the extent that some of these had a bug that returned INVALID_HANDLE instead of WSAEINVAL v.s. WSAENOTSOCK, we've fixed that bug and the fix will be in 2.0.44. Choose a product other than XP/WinRoute or choose another webserver if you are married to that product. Another alternative, we will have a couple of options to toggle Sendfile Off and to toggle ReuseSockets off in the next release. But if those don't work, as I stated in the bug report, "XP/Winroute is also incompatible with Apache". Please do *not* reopen this bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]