DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26052>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26052 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-07 16:36 ------- (In reply to comment #13) > > We all know that the 3rd party developers are not going to change this as they > are not well-versed in apache and write code that runs on many webservers And use a variable that is only present on one specific webserver (httpd)? And use a variable whose API is limited to non mass virtual hosting? > > Its a bug, no one wants to admit it though :) No it is not. We are talking abount an enhancement here. > > If someone else made such a fix would there even be acceptance of it by the > apache team? Or are hearts hardened and this is seen as not a bug but a Feel free to provide a patch. I cannot promise that it goes into the code base, because - From the discussion it seems obvious that for most of the httpd developers this is a low priority issue. - It depends on the way the patch solves the problem. > > I'm about ready to pay a bounty to get this resolved. > Thats what I love about open software. If the developers don't want to change what you want, you can either solve it for yourself or pay somebody else to do so. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
