DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40169>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40169 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-20 00:14 ------- (In reply to comment #7 and #8) > Agreed. I think the documentation could be worded a little better, and even the > addition of a CacheEnableMatch could be handy. I think your suggestion is > correct for the problem at hand though. Oh I got impatient with the matching logic and while I have not added 'CacheEnableMath' or 'CacheDisableMatch' I have rewritten and rather generalized the matching process by giving it comprehensible semantics. I found that the matching logic is passed not the URI but four distinct fields for scheme, hostname, port and path, so they are matched separately. Then I decided that the scheme should not be really prefix-matched. Among the changes: * Now a "/...." will not match a proxy URI like "http://...";, and viceversa of course. * Prefix matching for hostnames does not make much sense, do I have added minimal suffix matching: "*w.example.com" will match any hostname ending in "w.example.com" and ".example.com" will match any hostname ending in ".example.com". All I have tested it a bit (I have removed the extensive debugging code from the submitted patch) and it is all nicely commented. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
