DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39243>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39243 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-03 16:50 ------- Sorry. I should have added above that there are no client certificates involved in these uploads. I'm not savvy enough about the internals of either apache or plone to know, but I suppose that means it's possible that what I'm seeing is not actually this bug, but the behavior of my systems match the symptoms in every way except for the involvement of client certificates, so to me that means that if they are not the same, then they are at least, very probably strongly associated with each other. When I upload files 128kb and smaller, it works as expected. When I attempt to upload files 129kb and larger, I get this: Error message in browser: Title: 413 Request Entity Too Large Page: Request Entity Too Large The requested resource /Members/admin/portal_factory/Image/image.2007-03-03.9545920618/atct_edit does not allow request data with POST requests, or the amount of data provided in the request exceeds the capacity limit. Error message in logs: [Sat Mar 03 19:26:35 2007] [error] [client xxx.yyy.zzz.ttt] request body exceeds maximum size for SSL buffer, referer: https://www.example.com/Members/admin/portal_factory/Image/image.2007-03-03.9545920618/edit [Sat Mar 03 19:26:35 2007] [error] [client xxx.yyy.zzz.ttt] could not buffer message body to allow SSL renegotiation to proceed, referer: https://www.example.com/Members/admin/portal_factory/Image/image.2007-03-03.9545920618/edit I've spoken with someone on the plone list who's using RHEL and apache/ssl/plone in the same manner that I am, and he reports not suffering from this problem. I'm not sure if he has any upper limit at all, or if the upper limit is simply larger than 128kb. I'm still talking with him. I guess redhat has applied some sort of patch. Does anyone know about that? Is it the same one mentioned in this bug report? I'd like to have the limit (if it must exist) be up in the 40-50 MB range myself. If there's another patch, perhaps someone could refer me to it? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
