https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44995
--- Comment #4 from Jan Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-19 02:54:17 PST ---
Couldn't the below listed function from http_protocol.c the probem?
With defines
#define LEVEL_400 19
#define LEVEL_500 44
#define RESPONSE_CODES 55
I can't see how an valid index for 450 could be returned with this function
/* The index is found by its offset from the x00 code of each level.
* Although this is fast, it will need to be replaced if some nutcase
* decides to define a high-numbered code before the lower numbers.
* If that sad event occurs, replace the code below with a linear search
* from status_lines[shortcut[i]] to status_lines[shortcut[i+1]-1];
*/
AP_DECLARE(int) ap_index_of_response(int status)
{
static int shortcut[6] = {0, LEVEL_200, LEVEL_300, LEVEL_400,
LEVEL_500, RESPONSE_CODES};
int i, pos;
if (status < 100) { /* Below 100 is illegal for HTTP
status */
return LEVEL_500;
}
for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
status -= 100;
if (status < 100) {
pos = (status + shortcut[i]);
if (pos < shortcut[i + 1]) {
return pos;
}
else {
return LEVEL_500; /* status unknown (falls in
gap) */
}
}
}
return LEVEL_500; /* 600 or above is also
illegal */
}
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
