https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56924
--- Comment #4 from Mark Montague <[email protected]> --- (In reply to jkaluza from comment #2) > I'm going to apply this patch to trunk, but I think the second part of the > patch is not needed. [...] > This just copies '\0', so everything looks OK. Do you agree or there was > something I'm missing here? I agree that the second part of the patch is not needed and does not affect anything. My concern was that if the original value for w was "ContentType:\0" then the '\0' that got copied would be the one that replaced the ':' rather than the one immediately after it. This is purely an academic point. I won't be able to check whether w is actually w is "ContentType:\n\n\0" or "ContentType:\0" until tonight. Thanks for the quick and helpful handling of this bug! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
