https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52210

--- Comment #25 from Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> ---
It seems that HAVE_TLS_NPNX is defined instead of HAVE_TLS_NPN in the part of
the patch below.
Also, probably it shouldn't be defined when OPENSSL_NO_TLSEXT is used (like
HAVE_TLS_ALPN).


diff -ru gen/httpd-2.4.x/modules/ssl/ssl_private.h modules/ssl/ssl_private.h
--- gen/httpd-2.4.x/modules/ssl/ssl_private.h    2015-01-19 16:52:30.000000000
+0100
+++ modules/ssl/ssl_private.h    2015-01-19 15:42:53.908000000 +0100
@@ -176,6 +169,16 @@
[...]
+/* Next Protocol Negotiation */
+#if !defined(OPENSSL_NO_NEXTPROTONEG) && defined(OPENSSL_NPN_NEGOTIATED)
+#define HAVE_TLS_NPNX
+#endif

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to