https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61081
--- Comment #4 from [email protected] --- (In reply to Eric Covener from comment #3) > > I see, I think that is reasonable, but I would suggest avoiding new > container/section construct for it. In a proprietary SSL plugin, that uses > named certificates rather than paths, it was just repeated > "SSLSNIMap hostname label". However it seems most reasonably implemented in the config would be fine with me. :) It seems like right before ssl_find_vhost() is where this would happen? > > The interaction with current ssl-vhost-config selection by SNI would need to > be sorted out too. Documenting the status quo would be a good start! I think just having a fallback would suffice? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
