https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65159
--- Comment #38 from WJCarpenter <[email protected]> --- Patch https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38021&action=diff looks pretty good to me, too. There's a lot of complexity still floating around in this module's code, but I'd be happy with "if it ain't broke...." and use this simple solution. I don't know enough to comment on whether or not to use apr_atomic_inc32(). Although an atomic increment is obviously good in theory, are there any possible performance side effects? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
