https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65627
--- Comment #8 from Yann Ylavic <ylavic....@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Ruediger Pluem from comment #7) > > The question is, how we want to allow if at all another module to say that > we should get out of the way with regards to lingering closes. Do we allow > to set the socket to NULL via ap_set_core_module_config or do we demand > that is has to set c->aborted to 1 as you suggest. Yeah indeed that's the question. Thinking more about it, c->aborted = 1 will still call the output filter chain so in the case of mod_itk it may cause issues (no request_rec in the forking/parent process). We have supported the NULL socket so far so we probably still need to in 2.4.x, mpm_prefork (which mpm_itk is still requiring AFAICT) will call ap_lingering_close() after ap_process_connection() in any case, so it seems that NULL socket is the only safe option for third-party modules as of now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-h...@httpd.apache.org
