https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65725
--- Comment #17 from Ruediger Pluem <[email protected]> --- (In reply to farhanz from comment #15) > Yes, I think that that should work. Any specific reason we don't want to > make changes within ap_send_interim_response function? Perhaps there's a > bunch of other code that calls this function and it's safer to make changes > in the caller and not within the function itself? The current contract of the ap_send_interim_response function (although not documented) is that the the caller sets the correct status_line for the interim response and that the function falls back to generating one from the status if none is provided. As this function is part of the public API I am hesitate of changing that unless it is clear that the expected contract is different. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
