https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65832
--- Comment #2 from Eric Covener <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Ruediger Pluem from comment #1) > Confused now. My understanding is that only connections in keepalive will be > stopped not ones that are in use. A client using a keepalive connection > should be prepared that it gets closed. This cannot be handled gracefully > always as non idempotent request if sent cannot be just resent. How would > closing keepalives earlier improve the situation? The one being closed in the snippet is closed shortly after the client has reused it. IOW It's not simultaneous or a race, we're responding to activity on the socket. Closing them in advance (when the process has zero idlers) would be susceptible to races / simultaneous close (of more sockets, assuming the server was going to recover in time) but this kind of race is present on every timeout. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
