https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69203
--- Comment #2 from Yann Ylavic <[email protected]> --- I think SCRIPT_NAME is still the same as before (2.4.59) since it's based on r->uri or r->path_info (IIUC) and we only canonicalize r->filename? SCRIPT_FILENAME has changed from ".../info 1.php" to ".../info%201.php" in this case though, but I can't find SCRIPT_FILENAME in the spec.. We already had issues with what php-fpm does with SCRIPT_FILENAME, all the FCGI_MAY_BE_FPM jazz. IMHO having SCRIPT_FILENAME not be the same depending on whether ProxyPass or SetHandler is used (like we had before) is not good anyway, whether both should or not be encoded I don't know.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
