https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753
--- Comment #5 from Ruediger Pluem <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Joe Orton from comment #4) > Though I note Jens says: "using an IPv6 literal address without a scope > identifier works fine" > > So actually maybe it's not worse. I guess if the address is ambiguous > without a scope, you get an error from connect() anyway. On Linux that > appears to be true. I guess if we add the scope id to the addr string we get some trouble with DNS resolution later as it cannot deal with it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
