Hey Miod,
It crashed again last night so I rebuilt the kernel with your patch.
Both hpc0 and hpc1 now report 25 mhz. I've attached the full dmesg
below for reference.
Thanks again, Miod!
-Jesse
[ using 388904 bytes of bsd ELF symbol table ]
Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
Copyright (c) 1995-2016 OpenBSD. All rights reserved. http://www.OpenBSD.org
OpenBSD 6.0 (GENERIC-IP22) #0: Sat Jul 16 12:21:12 EDT 2016
[email protected]:/usr/src/sys/arch/sgi/compile/GENERIC-IP22
real mem = 167772160 (160MB)
rsvd mem = 802816 (1MB)
avail mem = 160169984 (152MB)
mainbus0 at root: Challenge S
cpu0 at mainbus0: MIPS R5000 CPU rev 1.0 150 MHz, R5000 based FPC rev 1.0
cpu0: cache L1-I 32KB D 32KB 2 way, L2 512KB direct
int0 at mainbus0 addr 0x1fbd9880
imc0 at mainbus0: revision 3
gio0 at imc0
hpc0 at gio0 addr 0x1fb80000: SGI HPC3 (onboard, 25MHz)
zs0 at hpc0 offset 0x00059830 irq 29: 85230
zstty0 at zs0 channel 1: console
zstty1 at zs0 channel 0
sq0 at hpc0 offset 0x00054000 irq 3: Seeq 80c03, address 08:00:69:0a:34:09
wdsc0 at hpc0 offset 0x00044000 irq 1: WD33C93B, 20.0 MHz, burst DMA
wdsc0: microcode revision 0x0d, fast SCSI
scsibus0 at wdsc0: 8 targets, initiator 0
sd0 at scsibus0 targ 1 lun 0: <SEAGATE, ST39103LCSUN9.0G, 034A> SCSI2
0/direct fixed serial.SEAGATE_ST39103LCSUN9.0GLS4557570000101519ZQ
sd0: 8637MB, 512 bytes/sector, 17689267 sectors
pione at hpc0 offset 0x00059800 irq 5 not configured
panel0 at hpc0 offset 0x00059850 irq 9: power button
dsclock0 at hpc0 offset 0x00060000
hpc1 at gio0 addr 0x1fb00000: SGI HPC3 (IO+ mezzanine, 25MHz)
hpc1: using EXP1's DMA channel
sq1 at hpc1 offset 0x00054000 irq 0: Seeq 80c03, address 08:00:69:02:64:d1
clock0 at mainbus0: int 5
vscsi0 at root
scsibus1 at vscsi0: 256 targets
softraid0 at root
scsibus2 at softraid0: 256 targets
boot device: sd0
root on sd0a (ffbd62fcf39fc195.a) swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Miod Vallat <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Theo suggested that a fix for ARP committed the other day might have
>> some impact on this so I've been testing the latest snapshot. So far
>> I've been up for 19:47, so it's looking good so far. Interestingly
>> enough I was getting "sq1: receive FIFO overflow" periodically with
>> the previous snapshot, so far on this boot that has not recurred.
>>
>> If the box cores again I'll test your diff and see if that improves my
>> situation.
>
> If you still get `receive FIFO overflow' messages, even if the kernel
> does not panic, please test this diff and tell me what speed gets
> reported for hpc0 and hpc1 attachments.
>
> Thanks,
> Miod
