On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 06:21:01PM +1000, Jonathan Matthew wrote:
> On 10/12/17 03:26, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 04:33:28PM +0100, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado 
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 02:27:29PM +0100, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 11:52:46AM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > > > On 07/12/17(Thu) 08:34, Landry Breuil wrote:
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > i've been having kvm VMs running 6.2 hardlocking/deadlocking since a
> > > > > > while, all those running on proxmox 5.1 using linux 4.13.8 & 
> > > > > > qemu-kvm
> > > > > > 2.9.1. There were hardlocks upon reboot which were 'solved' by 
> > > > > > disabling
> > > > > > x2apic emulation in kvm (args: -cpu=kvm64,-x2apic) or giving the 
> > > > > > host
> > > > > > cpu flags to the vm (args: -cpu host) but there still remains 
> > > > > > deadlocks
> > > > > > during normal operation.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I'm now running a kernel with MP_LOCKDEBUG, so i'm collecting 
> > > > > > traces in
> > > > > > the vain hope that it might help someone interested in locking 
> > > > > > issues.
> > > > > > Here's the latest one:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Let me add that when you had x2apic enabled the kernel 'froze' inside
> > > > > x2apic_readreg, trace below:
> > > > > 
> > > > >    ddb{0}> tr
> > > > >    x2apic_readreg(10) at x2apic_readreg+0xf
> > > > >    lapic_delay(ffff800022136900) at lapic_delay+0x5c
> > > > >    rtcput(ffff800022136960) at rtcput+0x65
> > > > >    resettodr() at resettodr+0x1d6
> > > > >    perform_resettodr(ffffffff81769b29) at perform_resettodr+0x9
> > > > >    taskq_thread(0) at taskq_thread+0x67
> > > > >    end trace frame: 0x0, count: -6
> > > > > 
> > > > > What you're seeing with a MP_LOCKDEBUG kernel is just a symptom.  A 
> > > > > CPU
> > > > > enters DDB because another one is 'frozen' while holding the
> > > > > KERNEL_LOCK().  What's interesting is that in both case the frozen CPU
> > > > > is trying to execute apic related code:
> > > > >    - x2apic_readreg
> > > > >    - lapic_delay
> > > > > 
> > > > > I believe this issue should be reported to KVM developers as well.
> > > > 
> > > > *very* interestingly, i had a new lock, running bsd.sp.. So i think that
> > > > rules out openbsd mp.
> > > > 
> > > > ddb> tr
> > > > i82489_readreg(0) at i82489_readreg+0xd
> > > > lapic_delay(ffffffff81a84090) at lapic_delay+0x5c
> > > > rtcget(ffffffff81a84090) at rtcget+0x1a
> > > > resettodr() at resettodr+0x3a
> > > > perform_resettodr(ffffffff81659e99) at perform_resettodr+0x9
> > > > taskq_thread(0) at taskq_thread+0x57
> > > > end trace frame: 0x0, count: -6
> > > 
> > > Try running with "-machine q35". It changes the emulated machine to
> > > a modern platform.
> > 
> > Right, i suppose that matches https://wiki.qemu.org/Features/Q35,
> > interesting. Will definitely try, mailed the kvm mailing list but got no
> > feedback so far.
> 
> I've been seeing this for a while too, on VMs that are already run with
> -machine q35 and -cpu host.  I was blaming my (still unfinished) pvclock
> code, but now I can fairly easily trigger it on single cpu VMs without that,
> mostly by running kernel compiles in a loop in a couple of different guests.
> I'm using a Fedora 25 (4.10.15-200.fc25.x86_64) kernel.
> 
> Adding some debug output to lapic_delay, it appears the KVM virtualized
> lapic counter hits zero and doesn't reset, so the lapic_delay loop in the
> guest never terminates.  KVM has several different ways it can provide the
> lapic counter and I'm not sure which one I'm using yet.
> 
> I just tried making lapic_delay give up after a million zero reads, and it
> seems to recover after a minute or so.  I'll leave it running to see if it
> happens again.

Hah, interesting. So i know i can try q35 just for the sake of emulating
a newer hw platform, but that wont fix this issue.

I see upstream this thread/patchset: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/28/773
But i'm not sure that's the same issue.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9036161/ might be too ?

When you say you modified lapic_delay, i guess that's on the guest side ?

Landry

Reply via email to