Andreas Bartelt(o...@bartula.de) on 2018.03.01 19:18:29 +0100: > On 03/01/18 09:07, Jiri B wrote: > >On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 08:37:38AM +0100, Andreas Bartelt wrote: > >>Please let me know if you need further infos on my specific config. > > > >I use this (OpenBSD 6.2-current (GENERIC.MP) #6: Tue Feb 13 20:16:11 MST > >2018): > > > >/etc/hostname.vether20 > > > >rdomain 20 > >inet 172.16.20.2 255.255.255.0 172.16.20.255 description "archive rdomain" > >group onion > >!ifconfig lo20 inet 127.0.0.1/8 > >!route -T20 -qn add -net 127 127.0.0.1 -reject > >!route -T20 -qn add default 172.16.20.1 > > > > thanks -- your variant for setting an IP address for lo(4) in the > underlying interface's rdomain is less evil than delaying the ifconfig > statement until /etc/rc.local is run. Your variant also still works on > current. > > Nevertheless, I suppose there was nothing inherently wrong with my > previous approach to configuring an IP address for loX via > /etc/hostname.loX which is now broken on current. Or is there a good > reason I'm not aware of that this variant doesn't work anymore?
Thanks for your report. There was a change on how rdomains an lo devices interact. We have to decide if this is just a documentation problem or should be solved differently.
