MB <iam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Invest in a NetApp filer and do it the right way. Plenty of options > spectrascale glfs/cnfs lustre with DNE/IME why struggle with this hobby OS, > seriously? > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 1:31 AM MB <iam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Why are you using ooenbsd for anything but a firewall. Even then its > > lagging way behind unless you deploying in a dentist office. Openbsd sucks > > at pretty much everything else. Sorry I come from corporate real world > > experience not Soho stuff. Use Linux. > >
A couple of points: (1) Stop top-posting. (2) NetApp is using BSD nfs code. (3) I have run OpenBSD in a "corporate world" on a global scale and it usually outperforms everything else, including Linux, and definitely is much more stable and secure. (4) If OpenBSD "sucks" and you are on a mailing list that "sucks", your life must be truly miserable. To the original author of this thread -- nfs is a UNIX technology, originally made for Unix to Unix communication on a network. Windows client support came later and it is still not stellar. Samba/CIFS is what is a usual scenario here. But if you are serious about this and want to attract developers' attention then please become familiar with sendbug(1). http://www.openbsd.org/report.html --Andy