On 2018/08/11 15:57, Theo de Raadt wrote: > Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: > > > On 2018/08/11 19:32, Sebastien Marie wrote: > > > I am also > > > unsure if loadfirmware() steal the slaacd context due to the use of > > > `curproc'. > > > > since it was using ifconfig context (as seen with unveil) that seems likely > > In the ps listing there is a * next to slaacd. > > This is not ifconfig's context. It crashed in pledge code, because it > was a process which is pledged. Which is the slaacd master. > > It is a very tricky and fun bug. >
Ah. I had been thinking slaacd might bring the interface up like ifconfig and dhclient do, but now I see that's not the case. Fun indeed!
