Sebastien Marie wrote: > > does it makes sens to call __sflush() instead of fflush() in vdprintf() ? > > the FILE variable used by vdprintf() is "home made" on the stack, using > a buffer on the stack too. And as fflush() only enclose __sflush() > with FILE locking, I don't see the gain to use fflush() here.
This makes sense. ok me too.
