Timely fix isn't it :-) Theo Buehler <t...@theobuehler.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 03:10:45PM -0800, Philip Guenther wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Nov 2019, Theo Buehler wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 03:32:48PM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > > > > kern.version=OpenBSD 6.6-current (GENERIC.MP) #433: Thu Nov 7 > > > > > 10:41:08 MST 2019 > > > > > > > > That is too old and does not contain the solution. > > > > > > I obtained a different binary with the latest sets, but still see the > > > same problem. The new binary is available under > > > > The change is to the C compiler, not the linker. Did you rebuild all the > > .o files with an up-to-date clang? > > Yes. However, I must have confused myself somehow... > > I downloaded the latest snaps, > > OpenBSD 6.6-current (GENERIC.MP) #436: Thu Nov 7 14:52:31 MST 2019 > > with this clang: > > SHA256 (/usr/bin/clang) = > afa90a194296b48c64f01c5547994f774ca18a73503651ca6c33a495e59509c5 > > The binary (rebuilt with make clean && make DEBUG='-g -O0') can be > executed: > > $ ../bin/lean && echo $? > 0 > > and other tests run as expected. It has a more decently sized random > section: > > OPENBSD_RANDOM 0x0000000001185000 0x0000000001185000 0x0000000001185000 > 0x0000000000007d28 0x0000000000007d28 RW 8 > > It's the same binary I uploaded previously... > > $ sha256 ../bin/lean SHA256 (../bin/lean) = > 9120c128c71e03b9fc560f96277f71ecd0fa7ab8d86874fd85f4bfc95e7e6faf >
