On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 09:53:02AM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 08:53:14AM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 06:32:01PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 04:43:44PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> > > > > outdated...)
> > > > 
> > > > I tried the first, that only seemed to have the effect of having
> > > > the freeze come faster. So I commented out that part of the xorg.conf
> > > > and I'm trying the steps in the README now, but for some reasons I
> > > > don't get any dumps in /var/crash as expected. Then again I could well
> > > > be missing some crucial step.
> > > 
> > > Still no luck getting coredumps but when I sshed in after the last freeze
> > > the last two lines of dmesg were 
> > > 
> > > [drm] *ERROR* ring sdma0 timeout, signaled seq=110053, emitted seq=110053
> > > [drm] *ERROR* Process information: process  pid 0 thread  pid 0
> > > 
> > > the [drm] part has me suspect this is related (but I don't know what sdma
> > > signifies in this context)
> > 
> > sdma is the asynchronous System DMA engine
> > 
> > Ring timeouts like this are a known problem with amdgpu which persist
> > across multiple major drm versions.
> 
> Looking at what appears in the log (/var/log/messages) the time when X
> freezes corresponds very well with when those messages are recorded.
> 
> The question is, how do I usefully debug this? I've gone over the README's 
> procedure a few times now and it unfortunately does not produce any coredumps
> or traces.

The point at which ring timeouts are encountered I believe acceleration
is disabled.  Likely it hits some not well tested error path after that.

> 
> One option is of course to trade up or sideways to something like
> https://www.power.no/data-og-tilbehoer/pc-og-mac/baerbar-pc/asus-zenbook-s-ux393ea-pure2-13-laptop/p-1115705/
> (Intel Core i7-1165G7 with Iris Xe graphics), but would that have a better
> chance of success (or for that matter be helpful to the project)?

While there is some support for tiger lake in the linux 5.7 based drm
in -current I know of at least one machine that needs the newer 5.10
based drm tree I am working on.  Trying to deal with some regressions on
older Intel hardware with that at the moment.

> 
> All the best,
> Peter
> 
> -- 
> Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
> http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.bsdly.net/ http://www.nuug.no/
> "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic"
> delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds.
> 
> 

Reply via email to