Greg Steuck <gne...@openbsd.org> writes: > I went looking for why things are better on FreeBSD and they have a > different (simpler) implementation of cos. I copied it over. Given the > common provenance, I expect the copyright situation to be unambiguous. > > With the two patches things look almost universally better in > regress/libm. I attached both logs from amd64. > > Anybody has ideas for other tests that make sense to do? Maybe people > can help me run regress on less common platforms?
Anybody got feedback on this? mbuhl@ asked if I understand what's wrong with our existing cos implementation. I don't. I deferred to the fact that the number of passing tests increased and took this as a sign of progress. Thanks Greg
