> hi. > > the trouble is, openbsd supports a single month name argument to cal(1): > > $ cal jan > > the ability is non-standard, but is documented as such. > > so our SYNOPSIS is correct and this proposal, as far as i can see, > incorrect. > > jmc
Indeed, my proposed SYNOPSIS ignores the month name exception. Sorry for that. On the proposed patch for cal.c; do you think that it is correct and that the issue on the misleading error message is valid?