> OK to violate RFC for performance and simplicity? I also think the RFC is asking too much (insensitive to the cost on software routers).
- pf: UDP divert-to to a local addr won't send traffic back K R
- Re: pf: UDP divert-to to a local addr won't send traf... Alexander Bluhm
- Re: pf: UDP divert-to to a local addr won't send ... Theo de Raadt
- Re: pf: UDP divert-to to a local addr won't send ... K R
