I might be wrong but I think with many of the modern wlan interfaces, this is controlled by the firmware rather than the net80211 layer..
I think _probably_ the table you're looking at is mainly there for hostap. btw, bugs@ is the wrong place for feature requests. I think generally misc@ would be better. On 2025/09/01 15:56, ykla wrote: > No diff, sorry. just feature request. > > Mike Larkin <[email protected]> 于2025年9月1日周一 10:47写道： > > > > On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 04:26:10AM +0800, ykla wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Hello OpenBSD developers, > > > > > > I would like to propose an update to the net80211 ieee80211_regdomain.c > > > and .h files. These files have not received any commits for over ten > > > years, > > > and the current regdomain definitions are missing several modern features: > > > > > > - DFS channels support (e.g., channels > 48) > > > - Wider regional coverage for 802.11ac (VHT) in many countries > > > - Support for 160 MHz channels > > > > > > While OpenBSD's support for 802.11ac and ax remains limited, updating > > > these files would be beneficial. The current lack of these entries > > > prevents proper configuration of devices under many regional regulations. > > > > > > Developers can refer to the Linux wireless regulatory database for > > > guidance: > > > https://wireless.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/en/developers/regulatory/wireless-regdb.html > > > > > > Please update net80211/ieee80211_regdomain.c / .h to > > > support DFS channels, wider 802.11ac coverage, and 160 MHz > > > > > > Thank you for considering this enhancement. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > ykla > > > > > > > Hi > > > > Was there supposed to be a diff attached to this mail? I don't see it. > > > > -ml >
