On May 14, 2026 9:43:33 AM GMT+02:00, Alexandr Nedvedicky <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Hello,
>On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 08:30:02AM +0200, Gabriele Vento wrote:
>>
>>
>> On May 14, 2026 12:48:03 AM GMT+02:00, Vitaliy Makkoveev <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 08:54:24AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> >> Is this a byte order problem?
>> >>
>> >
>> >I just check wg(4) on my Powerbook G4. Everything works fine. It runs
>> >"OpenBSD 7.9 (GENERIC) #54: Fri May 8" but I'm pretty sure 7.8 should
>> >also work fine.
>> >
>> >Gabriele, what do yo mean saying "just doesn't work"? Does it failed to
>> >connect to the peer or does it successfully connect, but traffic does
>> >not go within tunnel?
>> Traffic does not go within the tunnel.
>>
>
> can you share output of `ifconfig wg` for both tunnel ends?
On my end it is outputs
wg0: flags=80c3<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST> mtu 1300
description: ...
index 8 priority 0 llprio 3
wgport 22670
wgpubkey ...
wgpeer ...
wgpsk (present)
wgpka 15 (sec)
wgendpoint 15.204.55.83 42070
tx: 7844, rx: 0
wgaip 15.204.55.83/10
groups: wg
inet ... netmask 0xffffffff
For the other end of the tunnel, I do not own that endpoint so I cannot provide
the output.
> optionally content of /etc/hostname.wgX on both endpoints.
My system does not appear to possess that file.
> Make sure to redact/remove any keys for tunnel. I suspect
> there might be issue with wgaip settings which Stuart mentioned.
>
> also if you can check output of
> route get $IP_address_reached_over_tunnel
> command should help us to tell the routing works as expected,
> you can use remote tunnel peer's address.
Sure, here is the output:
route to: 15.204.55.83
destination: 0.0.0.0
mask: 0.0.0.0
gateway: 10.34.116.212
interface: gem0
if address: 10.34.116.145
priority: 8 (static)
flags: <UP,GATEWAY,DONE,STATIC>
label: dhcpleased
use mtu expire
39 0 0
sockaddrs: <DST,GATEWAY,NETMASK,IFP,IFA,LABEL>
>
> also any chance pf(4) drops traffic for wg-tunnel?
I do not know how to check this, I read through tcpdump /var/log/pflog but it
only outputs a single line:
tcpdump: WARNING: snaplen raised from 116 to 160.
>thanks and
>regards
>sashan
>
