Sebastian Huber commented on a discussion on bsps/shared/dev/serial/zynq-uart-polled.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/199#note_112138 > + uint32_t desired_baud, > + uint32_t mode_clks, > + uint32_t *cd_ptr, > + uint32_t *bdiv_ptr > +) > +{ > + uint32_t best_error = UINT32_MAX; > + uint32_t best_cd; > + uint32_t best_bdiv_plus_one; > + uint32_t bdiv_plus_one; > + uint32_t selected_clock; > + > + _Assert((mode_clks & ~ZYNQ_UART_MODE_CLKS) == 0); > + selected_clock = zynq_uart_input_clock() / (1U << (3 * mode_clks)); > + > + for (bdiv_plus_one = 5; bdiv_plus_one <= 256; ++bdiv_plus_one) { The key difference to the previous implementation is that the code is easier to test and that the function tries to yield a sample set around 16 per RX-bit. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/199#note_112138 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list bugs@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs