Gedare Bloom commented on a discussion on bsps/aarch64/raspberrypi/i2c/raspberrypi-i2c.c: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/363#note_125321 > +typedef struct { > + i2c_bus base; > + uintptr_t input_clock; > + rtems_id task_id; > + uintptr_t base_address; > + raspberrypi_bsc_masters device; > + uintptr_t remaining_bytes; > + uintptr_t remaining_transfers; > + uint8_t *current_buffer; > + uintptr_t current_buffer_size; > + bool read_transfer; > +} raspberrypi_i2c_bus; > + > +static void i2c_polling_read( raspberrypi_i2c_bus *bus ) > +{ > + while ( !( S_REG( bus ) & S_DONE ) && ( bus->remaining_bytes > 0 ) ) { If the synchronization is handled at the i2c framework level, then this should be fine without adding additional locks inside. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/363#note_125321 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
