Prashant Rahul commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/924#note_139788 oh, no, no, absolutely not. I did not meant that the macro templating way of implementing this was "horrible". Infact, I would argue that its a better way since it has less code to maintain. I might have misunderstood the issue a little tho. There isn't much need of a rework I think, reverting back to this e8d59ca6af8991e23309bddd9b200f06c0e9d4a7 commit, and then applying changes that came later on while ignoring ralf's commits, and then at the end making sure all tests pass would suffice. I will do just that in this MR and in !929, I will add the RTEMS_INVALID_ADDRESS improvement. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/924#note_139788 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
