Claudio Grasso commented on a discussion: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/pkg/rtems-lwip/-/merge_requests/37#note_139858


Hi Gents,

I have updated the Merge Request to address your feedback regarding the 
directory structure and commit history.

**Changes made:**

1. **Directory Structure**: Moved the driver to the root **stm32h7/** directory 
to follow the Vendor Import pattern.
2. **Filenames**: Restored the original filenames (**ethernetif.c**, 
**`lan8742.c`**, etc.).
3. **Commit History**: The history has been reconstructed into two distinct 
commits:
   * **Import**: A clean commit containing only the unmodified vendor files.
   * **Adaptation**: A separate commit applying the RTEMS-specific changes 
(strictly additive using 

     **`#ifdef __rtems__`**).

I have verified that the build is clean and the test application links 
successfully and runs on our board.

Ready for your review.

PS: I have reviewed the documentation once again, and it is quite clear. My 
apologies for the previous attempts.

-- 
View it on GitLab: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/pkg/rtems-lwip/-/merge_requests/37#note_139858
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


_______________________________________________
bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
  • Re: lwIP | ... Supertoken (@project_491_bot_5f4dfb224b936e57b5f7b6883423c5ed)
  • Re: lwIP | ... Supertoken (@project_491_bot_5f4dfb224b936e57b5f7b6883423c5ed)
  • Re: lwIP | ... Claudio Grasso (@ClaudioGrasso)
    • Re: lw... Kinsey Moore (@opticron)
      • Re... Claudio Grasso (@ClaudioGrasso)
        • ... Kinsey Moore (@opticron)
          • ... Kinsey Moore (@opticron)
            • ... Claudio Grasso (@ClaudioGrasso)
              • ... Joel Sherrill (@joel)
              • ... Claudio Grasso (@ClaudioGrasso)
              • ... Claudio Grasso (@ClaudioGrasso)
              • ... Kinsey Moore (@opticron)
              • ... Claudio Grasso (@ClaudioGrasso)
              • ... Claudio Grasso (@ClaudioGrasso)
  • Re: lwIP | ... Supertoken (@project_491_bot_5f4dfb224b936e57b5f7b6883423c5ed)
  • Re: lwIP | ... Supertoken (@project_491_bot_5f4dfb224b936e57b5f7b6883423c5ed)
  • Re: lwIP | ... Supertoken (@project_491_bot_5f4dfb224b936e57b5f7b6883423c5ed)
  • Re: lwIP | ... Kinsey Moore (@opticron)
  • Re: lwIP | ... Kinsey Moore (@opticron)
  • Re: lwIP | ... Kinsey Moore (@opticron)
  • Re: lwIP | ... Kinsey Moore (@opticron)

Reply via email to