Joel Sherrill commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/952#note_140052 What case do you think is not covered? This **should** be covered. the _posix_ directory is a core one which has long had high coverage. We should ask for coverage runs, but at this point, there is still a bit of Python magic that is not in rtems-tests that is needed for coverage runs/reports. And it isn't part of the CI. @opticron Can you describe what needs to be done to get where rtems-test can handle the coverage reports and file an issue for this? -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/952#note_140052 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
