Chandan U commented: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1066#note_142895


I dropped psxmsgq05 from this MR since it overlaps existing psxmsgq01 coverage. 
I’ll send a minimal follow up against psxmsgq01 only if explicit boundary 
assertions are still needed for #5247.

-- 
View it on GitLab: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1066#note_142895
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


_______________________________________________
bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs

Reply via email to