Xinhong Hu commented: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/3791#note_143490 Hi @gedare @joel, Following the earlier discussion, I have opened a draft MR (!1084) implementing a per-instance `mq_ispriority` field for POSIX message queues. **Current scope:** - Introduce an RTEMS-specific `mq_ispriority` field in `struct mq_attr` - Preserve FIFO as the default behavior for backward compatibility - Select the underlying core discipline in `mq_open()` based on this field - No global configuration mechanism yet This draft focuses only on validating the per-instance approach. **I would appreciate feedback on:** 1. Whether this direction aligns with the intended resolution of [#3791](https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/3791) 2. Any concerns regarding structure layout or API impact 3. Whether a `confdefs.h` default mechanism should be added next Thank you for your guidance. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/3791#note_143490 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
