Chris Johns commented on a discussion on wscript: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1125#note_145794 > return top_group > > > +import subprocess > +import re > + > + > +def get_gcc_build_key(compiler): I do not mind how this is done. I think the idea of the policies is good. I do not like `VALIDATION` in the label as that already has a specific meaning. What about `GCC_BUILD_KEY_POLICY` ? It is simpler, shorter and direct? Are you able to help implementing this? -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1125#note_145794 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
