Wayne Thornton commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/administration/gitlab/-/issues/126#note_147983 It's not about when the MRs are blank -- that's understandable. There's no reason to add anything if AI wasn't used. My point is MRs where maintainers *have* used AI, like the example https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1182 where Gedare used AI but didn't actually fill out the AI properly, he just added that he used ChatGPT to walk the tree and ask him about it sometime. If a developer, maintainer, contributor anyone uses AI they should be holding themselves to the standard for the community. If the community sees that the maintainers aren't doing things properly then it leaves it open for them to ignore the guidelines as well. I might be in the minority with this opinion but what's good for the gander should be good for the goose. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/administration/gitlab/-/issues/126#note_147983 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
