SHIVAM DEOLANKAR commented on a discussion on 
testsuites/sptests/spclock_err02/init.c: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1103#note_149283

 > -  build_time( &time, 1, 1, 4096, 0, 0, 0, 0 );
 > +  /* Additional future year checks */
 > +
 > +  build_time( &time, 3, 1, 2100, 0, 0, 0, 0 );
 >    status = rtems_clock_set( &time );
 > -  fatal_directive_status( status, RTEMS_INVALID_CLOCK, "rtems_clock_set" );
 > -  print_time( "TA1 - rtems_clock_set - ", &time, " - RTEMS_INVALID_CLOCK\n" 
 > );
 > +  directive_failed(status, "rtems_clock_set"); // expect SUCCESS
 > +  print_time( "TA1 - rtems_clock_set - ", &time, " - RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL\n" );
 >    status = rtems_task_wake_after( rtems_clock_get_ticks_per_second() );
 >    status = rtems_clock_get_tod( &time );
 >    directive_failed( status, "rtems_clock_get_tod" );
 >    print_time( "TA1 - rtems_clock_get_tod - ", &time, " - 
 > RTEMS_SUCCESSFUL\n" );
 >  
 > -  build_time( &time, 12, 31, 1991, 23, 59, 59, 0 );
 > +  build_time( &time, 3, 1, 2200, 0, 0, 0, 0 );

I have updated this in the MR

-- 
View it on GitLab: 
https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1103#note_149283
You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.


_______________________________________________
bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs

Reply via email to