Pavel Pisa commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5563#note_149353 Thanks for reply. We have considered to construct and later to move CAN/CAN FD subsystem under `bsp/shared/dev` and I am open to it. But may it be we should move drivers and keep the core part, message queues, registration, etc. under `cpukit/dev/can`. Your feedback for this decision would be appreciated. For comparison, Linux SocketCAN core is under `net/can` and drivers under `drivers/net/can`. In QEMU, the core, non device specific part is in `net/can` and actual devices, controllers, emulation in `hw/net/can`. So may it be such division to `cpukit/dev/can` for core and `bsp/shared/dev` for chip drivers make sense. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5563#note_149353 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
