Chris Johns commented on a discussion: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1237#note_151852 @matteo.concas if you are happy and prefer this format then it is fine. I was not tracking this change and the reasons for it. There is no clear policy in the project for what code is to use the OAR format and what else can be used. If it is to be preferred and used then we should clearly state this. I have expressed a desire for the format to close to what existed in this code before the reformat and more in line with formats like the default LLVM. I am happy to see the score, sapi and rtems parts of the cpukit use OAR format. My revert post is get some attention on the topic to set a policy so it is clear what we want. I work on a number of large code bases and they are close enough to the LLVM style while OAR is different and not easy unless you are use to it. My wish was for RTEMS to be aligned to that format to make it easier for people coming to RTEMS. -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/merge_requests/1237#note_151852 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
