On Sun, 13 Feb 2000, Darren Reed wrote:
> You know if anyone was of a mind to find someone at fault over this,
> I'd start pointing the finger at ISP's who haven't been doing this
> due to "performance reasons".
To be fair, if you do this on most terminal servers (eg, Cisco 5300, Max
4000), they will collapse under the load.
> They've had the ability to do it for
> years and in doing so would seriously reduce the number and possibility
> of "spoofing" attacks.
See above. Having enough CPU available to handle spoof filtering from
dialups adds a lot to costs and most ISPs simply can't afford to pay
more in order to be able to provide that benefit. :-(
AB
