On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Hank Leininger wrote: >Hm. Joey's advisory listed a number of @trendmicro.com addresses he had >sent notifications to. He did not mention that the most obviously >appropriate of those had bounced :( > >Hank Leininger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hey Hank, (...and other folks) The address that currently works for TrendMicro is [EMAIL PROTECTED] For the fastest response, include the Case ID # in the subject line. For this issue, that's [TDSC237EA95D]. Sorry I didn't mention which addresses bounced and which did not. I was following the recommendations in RFPolicyV2, which states: ======================================================================= http://www.wiretrip.net/rfp/policy.html ======================================================================= Should the ORIGINATOR not be able to locate a suitable email address for the MAINTAINER, the ORIGINATOR should address the ISSUE to: security-alert@[MAINTAINER] secure@[MAINTAINER] security@[MAINTAINER] support@[MAINTAINER] info@[MAINTAINER] regardless of their existence. Anyone who could be deemed as a 'MAINTAINER' is encouraged to populate at least some of the above email addresses. ======================================================================= I agree that TrendMicro ought to establish a [EMAIL PROTECTED] account and route that to someone other than their general support staff. Joey -- "When you understand UNIX, you will understand the world. When you understand NT....you will understand NT" - Richard Thieme http://www.slothnet.com - is currently unavailable :(
