On Wed, 28 Feb 2001 09:36:27 EST, Valdis Kletnieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I seem to remember Schneier's "Applied Cryptography" discussing this. In any > case, the reason that triple-DES is limited to an *effective* 112 bits > of key is that DES is a "group". To sum up multiple pages of math, this Moral. Always proofread it *again*. The math follows from the fact that DES is *NOT* a group. I've already had 2 people notice I missed the '*NOT*'. ;( /Valdis (who needs to double-check his caffeine content before hitting send)
- Nortel CES (3DES version) offers false sense... spitko
- Re: Nortel CES (3DES version) offers fa... Rogier Wolff
- Re: Nortel CES (3DES version) offer... Dan Kaminsky
- Re: Nortel CES (3DES version) offer... MCKILLICAN, DONALD
- Re: Nortel CES (3DES version) o... MCKILLICAN, DONALD
- Re: Nortel CES (3DES version) o... Rogier Wolff
- Re: Nortel CES (3DES versio... Valdis Kletnieks
- Re: Nortel CES (3DES v... Valdis Kletnieks
- Re: Nortel CES (3DES versio... Kent Borg
- Re: Nortel CES (3DES v... Rogier Wolff
- Re: Nortel CES (3D... Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
- Re: Nortel CES (3D... Jack Lloyd
- Re: Nortel CES (3D... Crist Clark
- Re: Nortel CES... Ben Greenbaum
- Re: Nortel CES... Valdis Kletnieks
- Re: Nortel CES (3DES v... MCKILLICAN, DONALD
- Re: Nortel CES (3DES version) offer... L.W.
- Re: Nortel CES (3DES version) offers fa... Tina Bird
PGP signature