On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 06:01:48 PST, Ben Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  said:
> The idea of IP based penetration is also flawed, in that you'd get the
> default domain of the box anyways.  Unless that default domain has an
> index page to give you a choice of virtual hosts (and many/most don't),
> you wouldn't be able to access the desired http://www.juicysex.com anyways.

Unless of course you find a way to get the Host: header set the way you
want, and the blocking software is only looking at the GET/POST/whatever
query.

Note that this may depend on the exact particulars of how the filter is
implemented, and may not be possible on a "standard" browser/filter
combination.  But it's *not* safe to assume that "they can't get there
because there's no index page".  That's just security-through-obscurity.
--
                                Valdis Kletnieks
                                Operating Systems Analyst
                                Virginia Tech

PGP signature

Reply via email to