> I believe it could be dangeours in some cases, but people from
> Sun says that they won't repair the in.fingerd because:

Well finger is enabled by default and it runs as nobody... so you can't
link to /etc/shadow... 

finger  stream  tcp6    nowait  nobody  /usr/sbin/in.fingerd    in.fingerd

I think finger even still bounces.. @[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

> "There are may be legitimate reasons for finger to follow symlinks. If
> finger is considered a security issue, it can be disabled. (..)"

I think it's an issue of, what is the point of fixing it? 

>
> What do you think ?

I won't sleep at night over this one. 


Matt

Reply via email to