According to Darren Reed: > >> stupid window size of one byte may generate a very high overhead. > >Silly window sizes aren't so bad. > Oh no, they can be very bad and can choke performance measurably. They are very subtle too because you will not see them if you are "close" to the server. Once your RTT increases then you are more likely to see this problem, especially if you have a fat pipe (eg cable, adsl) because you can quickly fill the window and then have to wait for the acks to trickle back. -- =============================================================================== Brett Lymn, Computer Systems Administrator, BAE SYSTEMS ===============================================================================
- RE: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? David LeBlanc
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Pavel Machek
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Eric Vyncke
- RE: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Russ
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Darren Reed
- RE: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == ... David LeBlanc
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? gregory duchemin
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Darren Reed
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? John Kristoff
- RE: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Brett Lymn
- RE: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Franck Martin
- Re: Small TCP packets == very large overhead == DoS? Crist Clark
