Hi, So, should we bring up all patches that have been released 5 months ago or thereabouts? There's been a LOT of serious vulnerabilities released since then - if you're 5 months behind in patching, then there's more serious questions than this one patch.
We ALL need to keep up to date with patches. 5 month old patches are ancient news and should have been taken care of no more than about 4 months ago at the most. If this list were to make mention of all old patches after 5 months or so, the list would be flooded with nigh on useless information taking the bandwidth as compared to new, relevant patch and vulnerability. information. -- http://blog.hiltontravis.com/ Regards, Hilton Travis Phone: +61 (0)7 3105 9101 (Brisbane, Australia) Phone: +61 (0)419 792 394 Manager, Quark IT http://www.quarkit.com.au Quark Group http://www.quarkgroup.com.au Microsoft SBSC PAL (Australia) http://www.sbscpal.com/ War doesn't determine who is right. War determines who is left. This document and any attachments are for the intended recipient only. It may contain confidential, privileged or copyright material which must not be disclosed or distributed. Quark Group Pty. Ltd. T/A Quark Automation, Quark AudioVisual, Quark IT > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, 3 October 2008 4:54 PM > > what about the people who do not know about the bug or the patch? Mr. > Travis Hilton so it shouldnt be brought to my attention? it is a very > serious bug does one ever go to the root of any problems?
