What you see below was just for practice. I had some discussions around this in RE and with Kelly and the conclusion was that it would be jdk7-bNN as you are suggesting. I will also tag specific milestones as mentioned below.

Thanks,
-Xiomara


Mark Reinhold wrote:

Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 04:27:39 +0000
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Changeset: 2e4d6d562de7
Author:    xdono
Date:      2007-11-09 20:03 -0800
URL:       http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/rev/2e4d6d562de7

Added tag jdk7-ea-b99 for changeset 8792e7dbf130

The problem with this tag format, which is based on our ancient
bundle-naming scheme, is that the middle token changes over time,
from "ea" to "beta" to (maybe) "beta2" to "rc" to "fcs".  This
makes it unnecessarily difficult to look up a changeset for a
specific build -- you also need to know in which phase of the
release cycle it was promoted.

I think it'd make more sense to use simple "jdk7-bNN" tags, and
then also tag specific milestones as "jdk7-beta", "jdk7-rc1",
"jdk7-fcs", etc.

- Mark

Reply via email to